Discover PlayDecide. Download games, prepare, play. GET STARTED

Social media control

Choose your language

PlayDecide games may be available in multiple languages

Play the game

Download, prepare, discuss & collect results.

SIGN INRegister

Social media plays a vital role in modern society, shaping how we communicate, access information, and participate in public life. It can promote free speech, connect communities, and drive social change.

Author / translator Phil Wade

Social media plays a vital role in modern society, shaping how we communicate, access information, and participate in public life. It can promote free speech, connect communities, and drive social change. However, concerns about misinformation, online harassment, data privacy, and foreign influence have led to debates on whether governments should regulate or even control social media platforms. Striking the right balance between freedom and oversight is crucial to ensuring a safe, fair, and informed digital space. What approach should governments take toward social media regulation?

Created 29 January 2025
Last edited 29 January 2025
Topics Culture, Health, Technology

Policy positions

Policy position 1

No Government Intervention
The government must not interfere with social media platforms. The market and users will determine platform policies and content moderation. Freedom of expression and innovation should not be restricted by state control.

Policy position 2

Regulated but Not Controlled
The government should regulate social media to ensure transparency, privacy protection, and prevent harmful content (e.g., hate speech, misinformation). However, platforms should remain privately managed with minimal state influence.

Policy position 3

State-Governed Content Oversight
The government should actively monitor and regulate social media content to prevent misinformation, protect national security, and safeguard public well-being. Regulations should ensure that harmful content is quickly removed.

Policy position 4

Strict Government Control or Ban
The government should impose strict controls on social media platforms or ban them entirely if necessary. Social media can be harmful to society, and state control ensures that information shared online aligns with public interest and national security.

Story cards

Thumbnail

Ana is an activist who has been organizing environmental protests via social media for years. Recently, her social media accounts were flagged for spreading "false information" about the government’s environmental policies. Despite her claims being backed by research, the government imposed a temporary ban on her accounts. She feels silenced, but she also sees this as a sign of the government’s growing control over free speech. Ana now has to find alternative platforms to rally her supporters and raise awareness.

Ana’s Protest Story
Thumbnail

Ravi runs a small business selling handmade clothing through Instagram and Facebook. He’s built his customer base almost entirely through these platforms. However, after a recent change in government policy, there were sudden restrictions on the advertisements he could run, especially related to fashion items. This has severely impacted his sales, and he's now struggling to find ways to reach potential customers. Ravi believes that government control over social media advertisements is too restrictive and hurts small business owners like him.

Ravi’s Online Business
Thumbnail

Sarah is a mother of two young children. Recently, she noticed that her teenagers were spending a lot of time on social media, often engaging in arguments over political issues. After a period of escalating arguments and misinformation spreading in their online circles, Sarah pushed for the government to take more action to monitor social media content. She believes that increased regulation of what young people can access online will protect her children from harmful content and political polarization.

Sarah’s Family Story
Thumbnail

Lucas, a 26-year-old university student, is concerned about how much personal data is collected by social media platforms. After reading about the recent data privacy laws passed by his government, Lucas is relieved that his personal information is better protected. However, he’s also frustrated by the new laws limiting what he can post or share. Lucas feels that while privacy is important, these regulations compromise his freedom to express himself freely online.

Lucas and His Personal Privacy
Thumbnail

Maria, a young political activist, actively participated in the last national elections, using social media to organize protests and mobilize voters. However, after she witnessed firsthand the rapid spread of misinformation during the election, she grew concerned. The government stepped in to regulate social media platforms, but Maria feels that the government is using this as an excuse to stifle political dissent. Maria is torn between supporting election integrity and defending free speech.

Maria’s Election Experience
Thumbnail

Ahmed, a journalist, has been using social media to report on local issues that aren't often covered by mainstream media. After publishing a story about corruption in the local government, his accounts were temporarily suspended, and his articles were flagged as “unverified.” He wonders if the government is trying to suppress the truth. While Ahmed understands the need for some regulation, he fears that censorship is becoming a powerful tool for silencing independent voices.

Ahmed’s Censorship Dilemma
Thumbnail

Fiona is an activist working with a group focused on mental health awareness. Social media has been a vital tool for her to spread educational content and connect people who need support. However, after a new regulation passed by the government, Fiona’s campaign posts started getting blocked or flagged. The government claims it’s trying to curb harmful content, but Fiona believes that these actions are interfering with her ability to raise awareness and provide critical support to those suffering from mental health issues.

Fiona’s Health Awareness Campaign
Thumbnail

Jay, a 19-year-old student, is very active on social media. He uses platforms not only to interact with friends but also to stay informed on global events. Recently, the government implemented a strict policy on “digital citizenship,” forcing users to verify their identity and link their real names to online accounts. While Jay understands the importance of preventing online fraud, he is concerned that these measures could lead to more invasive surveillance of his online activity.

Jay’s Digital Citizenship
Thumbnail

Clara is an online entrepreneur who makes a living through content creation and social media marketing. With the government’s increasing regulation of social media, Clara fears that her creative freedom is being restricted. Recently, new rules were introduced that prevent influencers from posting certain types of content without government approval. Clara is unsure whether she should continue her business or find a way to navigate these new, stifling regulations.

Clara’s Online Freedom
Thumbnail

Tom, a 23-year-old social media user, has found himself increasingly affected by the constant stream of negativity and unrealistic body image expectations online. He’s struggled with self-esteem issues due to the content he encounters daily. Although Tom supports the government’s push to regulate social media platforms to remove harmful content, he worries that the increasing control could also lead to a loss of personal freedom in terms of content expression.

Tom’s Impact on Mental Health
Thumbnail

Lily is a 30-year-old writer and poet who has always used social media as a platform to express her personal views on politics, culture, and society. Recently, her account was flagged for "controversial" content after she shared a poem critiquing government policies. Although she believes in the power of free speech, Lily is now questioning how far she can go in expressing her views without risking the government controlling what she can say. She feels that this is a dangerous step towards silencing voices that need to be heard.

Lily’s Freedom of Expression
Thumbnail

Omar is a 45-year-old teacher who uses social media to stay updated on global news and share educational resources with his students. However, after recent government regulations on fake news and misinformation, he noticed that many of the independent news outlets he followed have been taken down or censored. Omar worries that while the intention behind these regulations is to prevent the spread of false information, they might also be shutting down important, alternative voices that provide different perspectives. He is now unsure whether the news he is seeing is truly unbiased or if the government is curating it to fit their own narrative.

Omar’s Search for Truth

INFO CARDSISSUE CARDS

Government Control vs. Free Speech

In some countries, governments regulate social media to limit misinformation, hate speech, or national security threats. However, critics argue that this can lead to censorship and suppression of free speech.
Should governments have the right to limit what people can post on social media?

Social Media and National Security

Many governments argue that social media can be used to spread misinformation, incite violence, or influence elections. Some have blocked or restricted platforms to prevent external interference. However, critics say such measures limit free speech and democratic participation.
How can governments balance national security concerns with protecting freedom of expression?

The Digital Divide: Who Controls the Internet?

In many countries, social media is owned and operated by foreign companies, such as Meta (Facebook, Instagram) and TikTok (China-based). Some governments worry that foreign control over these platforms threatens their national interests.
Should governments have more control over social media platforms operating in their countries? What risks come with this?

The Spread of Misinformation

Social media allows information to spread rapidly, but it also enables fake news, conspiracy theories, and propaganda. Some governments propose strict regulations, while others argue this would restrict free speech.
Who should be responsible for controlling misinformation—governments, tech companies, or users themselves?

Social Media Blackouts: A Necessary Measure?

Mauritius recently blocked access to social media during a political crisis, following the example of other governments that have done so during protests and elections. Supporters say this prevents unrest, while opponents call it an abuse of power.
Under what circumstances, if any, is it acceptable for a government to shut down social media?

Social Media’s Influence on Society

In some countries, governments use social media to shape public opinion and control narratives. At the same time, social media gives activists and ordinary citizens a powerful tool to challenge authority.
Does social media empower people, or does it give governments more control over society?

Social Media as a Tool for Social Movements

Social media has become an essential tool for activists and social movements around the world. From the Arab Spring to Black Lives Matter, platforms like Twitter and Facebook have helped organize protests, spread information, and rally support.
However, governments often view these movements as a threat to public order, leading them to impose restrictions.

The Role of Algorithms in Shaping Opinions

Social media platforms use algorithms to prioritize content that will engage users, but this can result in a filter bubble where people are exposed only to information that reinforces their existing views.
Governments have begun considering regulation of these algorithms to ensure more balanced and diverse content is promoted, but this raises questions about who should have control over what people see online.

The Commercialization of Social Media

Social media platforms are businesses that thrive on advertising revenue, which often leads to the exploitation of user data. Governments have started to impose regulations on how personal data is collected and sold by social media companies, aiming to protect users’ privacy and financial security.

The Role of Influencers in Shaping Public Opinion

Influencers on social media hold significant sway over their followers, often promoting products, political views, or social agendas. Governments are considering regulations to hold influencers accountable, but this could complicate the line between free speech and commercialization.

The Impact of Social Media on Journalism

The rise of social media has transformed journalism by offering direct access to news and citizen journalism. However, this shift has led to the decline of traditional media and the rise of misinformation. Governments are debating whether to regulate or support traditional journalism in the digital age.

Social Media and Election Interference

Social media has been used as a tool for both domestic and foreign interference in democratic elections. Fake news, bots, and manipulated content have spread rapidly, influencing voter opinions and undermining trust in election results.Governments are increasingly looking at how to regulate political content on social media to ensure fair elections.

The Power of Social Media

Social media platforms have over 4.5 billion users worldwide, influencing elections, social movements, and public opinion. They allow free expression but can also spread misinformation and harmful content at an unprecedented scale.

The Spread of Misinformation

False information spreads six times faster than the truth on social media. Misinformation about health, politics, and science has had real-world consequences, from vaccine hesitancy to election interference. Some argue that government regulation is necessary to combat these threats.

Freedom of Speech vs. Censorship

Many believe that social media should be a space for free expression. However, others argue that hate speech, harassment, and harmful content should be controlled. Where should the line be drawn between protecting free speech and preventing harm?

Data Privacy Concerns

Social media companies collect vast amounts of user data, often without full transparency. Governments have introduced laws like the GDPR (EU) and CCPA (California) to protect users. Should governments take stronger action to regulate data collection?

Social Media and Democracy

Governments and political groups use social media to influence public opinion. Some governments have been accused of spreading propaganda or using social media to manipulate elections. Should governments regulate political content online?

Government Censorship in Some Countries

Some governments tightly control social media, restricting access to certain platforms or censoring content. Countries like China, Iran, and North Korea have strict regulations, while others, like the EU and the US, focus on platform accountability. What approach is best?

The Role of Tech Companies

Major social media companies, such as Meta (Facebook), X (Twitter), and TikTok, set their own rules for content moderation. Some argue that these corporations have too much power over public discourse. Should private companies or governments decide what content is allowed?

The Rise of AI Moderation

Many platforms use Artificial Intelligence (AI) to detect and remove harmful content. However, AI is not perfect—it can miss dangerous posts or wrongly censor harmless content. Should governments set stricter guidelines for AI moderation?

Children and Mental Health

Studies suggest that excessive social media use can negatively impact mental health, especially for young people. Some governments have proposed age restrictions or time limits for minors. Should governments take a stronger role in protecting young users?

Economic Impact of Regulation

Regulating social media could have economic consequences. Stricter rules may limit innovation, hurt small businesses that rely on social media marketing, and reduce profits for tech companies. Should economic concerns outweigh the need for regulation?

Social Media Bans in Emergencies

Some governments temporarily shut down social media during protests, elections, or crises to prevent unrest or misinformation. Supporters say this maintains stability, while critics argue it suppresses free speech. Should governments have the power to block access in emergencies?

The Influence of Foreign Governments

Some countries use social media to spread propaganda, influence elections, or cause social division in other nations. Governments have accused platforms like TikTok, Facebook, and X of allowing foreign interference. Should stricter policies be in place to prevent this?

Recent Social Media Ban in Mauritius

In October 2024, Mauritius temporarily suspended access to major social media platforms following the leak of sensitive audio recordings involving politicians, journalists, and diplomats. The government cited concerns over national security and public safety as reasons for the ban, which coincided with the general elections.Critics argued that this move suppressed freedom of expression and limited access to information during a democratic process

Social Media Regulation in China

China maintains control over social media platforms. Some international platforms are blocked and domestic platforms are monitored. Users must register with their real identities, and companies are required to censor content deemed sensitive. This regulation aims to maintain social stability.

Discover PlayDecide. Download games, prepare, play. GET STARTED

Register to download vote results of this PlayDecide game.Register