Policy positions
Policy position 1
Non-therapeutic neuro-enhancement technologies should be regulated according to the actual legislation and the ethical values. Therefore, they do not need specific legislation.
Policy position 2
Considering that non-therapeutic NE combines different technologies (such as drugs, invasive and non-invasive neuro-modulation, etc.), specific regulatory agencies should be created in order to control and regulate the use of each case.
Policy position 3
A regulation system should be applied for non-therapeutic neuro-enhancement focused on the precautionary principle. Such position should be based on a risk assessment that took into account scientific evidence, recommendations from experts and international organizations (from different fields) and the whole society’s opinion.
Policy position 4
A strict control of non-therapeutic NE should be guaranteed by analyzing and authorizing case by case. This position seeks a generalized restriction controlled by a governmental agency, which would be responsible of authorizing and recording the research projects of these techniques as well as their application.