Policy positions
Policy position 1
Food taxes are unfair and unnecessary. Taxing food, especially processed and sugary products, is an excessive government intervention that disproportionately impacts low-income families who rely on affordable food options. Instead of imposing financial burdens, individuals should be responsible for their own dietary choices, and education should play a bigger role in promoting healthy habits.
Policy position 2
Food taxes are an essential tool to combat obesity and diet-related illnesses. Governments have a responsibility to safeguard public health by discouraging the consumption of unhealthy foods through taxation. This measure has been proven to work in other countries, reducing the consumption of sugary drinks and high-fat foods while generating revenue that can be reinvested into public health initiatives.
Policy position 3
A moderate approach is best—combining taxation with incentives. Instead of focusing solely on taxation, policymakers should adopt a mixed approach that includes lower taxes or subsidies on healthy foods while applying moderate taxes on unhealthy products. This strategy would encourage healthier choices while minimizing financial strain on consumers and businesses.
Policy position 4
The food industry should regulate itself, not be taxed. Rather than taxation, governments should encourage voluntary self-regulation by the food industry. Companies can reformulate products to include less sugar and fat, provide clearer labeling, and promote healthier options through marketing. This approach supports consumer choice without damaging the economy.
Policy position 5
Tax all processed foods, not just unhealthy ones. The government should implement a universal tax on all processed foods, including items traditionally considered "healthy," such as granola bars, protein shakes, and plant-based meat substitutes. The rationale is that all processed foods contribute to environmental degradation, increased packaging waste, and a reliance on artificial